Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:14:13 -0500
From:      Jay Hall <jhall@socket.net>
To:        Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
Cc:        Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Backup Size
Message-ID:  <BAFC2BBB-86CC-480B-9490-D4C0F8CA1E14@socket.net>
In-Reply-To: <200908101908.36042.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
References:  <6206A242-7226-48E3-8D09-A1D3A651F2A8@socket.net> <20090810170921.GC49364@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <D0D2566C-8912-4F77-BB54-714C7DB4B2D2@socket.net> <200908101908.36042.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


>
> Difficult. 512 bytes per entry + 1024 (EOF). See man 5 tar. But  
> since files
> will be padded there is some extra overhead. Also, it is hard to  
> calculate
> hard links and sparse files. Tar will handle these correctly (i.e.  
> preserve
> hard links and detect sparse files and try not archive "blocks of  
> nulls") but
> it is hard to calculate the size because of this before the archive  
> operation
> because of this.
> -- 
> Mel

Thanks.  I have been able to come close, but not exact.

Looks like close will have to be good enough.

Thanks again.


Jay



help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAFC2BBB-86CC-480B-9490-D4C0F8CA1E14>