Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:00:47 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r197218 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs Message-ID: <20090915150047.GA2199@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <4AAF944F.1040209@errno.com> References: <200909151134.n8FBYr8F086888@svn.freebsd.org> <4AAF944F.1040209@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:19:11AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >Author: pjd > >Date: Tue Sep 15 11:34:53 2009 > >New Revision: 197218 > >URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197218 > > > >Log: > > We believe ZFS is ready for production use. Remove a warning about it > > being > > experimental. :) > > This is great news! Is this amd64 only (or i386 too)? How about > non-x86 architectures (have people tested on sparc64, ppc, etc)? I do most of my tests on i386 with 1GB of RAM. It isn't optimal hardware configuration for ZFS, but it seems to work fine in most cases. For the other archs I think I tried sparc64 in the past and Marcel committed some fixes so it can work on ia64. When it comes to powerpc, arm, mips, etc. I haven't done any testing and I wouldn't recommend ZFS for those archs anyway. We should probably also warn about that. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKr6wfForvXbEpPzQRAqQ+AJ9SSjAhp0M9RJZkoBGYkYUr2u98zgCgkwgB x04cToAw9sp3ss5hMhPCz14= =EsnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090915150047.GA2199>