Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:00:41 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, libh@FreeBSD.org, Richy Kim <richy@apple.com> Subject: Re: packagetool.tcl Message-ID: <20010619210041.A2304@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010619110945.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:09:45AM -0700 References: <20010619115903.F65489@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <XFMail.010619110945.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake John Baldwin (jhb@FreeBSD.org): > It is modular enough (I think and hope) that one can simply "plug in" another > package library at the bottom to support multiple package styles. Do we want support for multiple package formats? Libh's format hasn't etablished yet and I wonder if it ever will. What do you think? I can focus on libh's current package format if people think it's worth it. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010619210041.A2304>