Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:14:20 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Marko Zec <zec@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 127267 for review
Message-ID:  <470A737C.3070805@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <200710062222.l96MMM7U044733@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200710062222.l96MMM7U044733@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marko Zec wrote:
> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=127267
> 
> Change 127267 by zec@zec_tpx32 on 2007/10/06 22:21:31
> 
> 	Change the M_REMOTE_VNET mbuf flag so that it won't
> 	collide with the newly introduced M_NOFREE flag in -HEAD
> 	on next IFC.
> 	
> 	Apparently we are running out of bits in mbuf flags...
> 
> Affected files ...
> 
> .. //depot/projects/vimage/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h#8 edit
> 
> Differences ...
> 
> ==== //depot/projects/vimage/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h#8 (text+ko) ====
> 
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
>  #define	M_LASTFRAG	0x2000	/* packet is last fragment */
>  #define	M_VLANTAG	0x10000	/* ether_vtag is valid */
>  #define	M_PROMISC	0x20000	/* packet was not for us */
> -#define	M_REMOTE_VNET	0x40000	/* mbuf crossed boundary between two vnets */
> +#define	M_REMOTE_VNET	0x80000	/* mbuf crossed boundary between two vnets */
>  
>  /*
>   * External buffer types: identify ext_buf type.
nope

I believe we still have
0xfff00000





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?470A737C.3070805>