Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:16:34 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Message-ID: <20030722011634.481702A7EA@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpznj778b7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote: > Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> writes: > > Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, a= > nd > > is rather consistent. > > "told you so" > > > So, who has been messing with make(1) lately? > > I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just > happens to be triggered by make(1) because it is a big (if not the > biggest) vfork(2) consumer. For a minute I had a horrible thought that it might have been a consequence of the lazy switch stuff. But the kernel on cueball predates the turn-on and doesn't have the options enabled. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030722011634.481702A7EA>