Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 18:24:12 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Molnar <stefan@exis.net> To: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com> Cc: jdd@vbc.net, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, chad@gaianet.net, isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Decision in Router Purchase Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.961114181707.1764F-100000@tarpon.exis.net> In-Reply-To: <199611142250.OAA04577@chimp.jnx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That is why we are using it. For us it is very coast effective. To handle it we are getting some 100MB ports for the eth switches. Even with the two the Ts, the CPU was at 90%. That just purely sucks. > You are correct in that T1 is 1.54Mbps (_before_ overhead), however it's > full duplex. Thus, the _aggregate_ bandwidth of the link is ~3Mbps. Okay. I give. I saw some the bell specs and saw some more info on it. You are correct. I should read my old bells specs some more. Stefan -------------------------------------------- Stefan Molnar Team Exis.Net stefan@exis.net Member EFF Slightly Silly Team OS/2 east-coast-ambassador@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU "She turned me into a Newt! A Newt? I got better." -Monty Python --------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.961114181707.1764F-100000>