Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:58:35 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.net>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-p2p/amule Makefile ports/net-p2p/amule/files patch-configure Message-ID: <CADLo83_A3Vr8i3xit1_6g-dyTNrkbJWGibC3Z4_qLLYdJPtw6Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF9858D.9000607@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112251903.pBPJ39SJ037714@repoman.freebsd.org> <1Reu5F-000KFr-GV@internal.tormail.net> <CADLo838hfAz-bwhxvNLbN4yDRhMXwEHdAzSjBMjUx0GczSmDrA@mail.gmail.com> <20111226060601.GA68567@FreeBSD.org> <4EF9858D.9000607@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/12/27 Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org>: > Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: > >>> It's not... but there's no need to specify LICENSE_FILE for a known >>> licence. >> >> >> Right, so perhaps this line should be dropped completely, not just >> commented >> out. =A0On a related note, thanks for removing LICENSE_FILE knobs for kn= own >> standard licenses, we need to cure this abuse for quite a while. > > > Well, actually the license framework documentation says exactly the > opposite, it recommends to set LICENSE_FILE also for known licenses. Oh dear.... reading bsd.licenses.mk shows that there's no 'pool' of known licenses, which means that doing stuff like LICENSE=3DGPLv2 without LICENSE_FILE violates the GPL. I'll look at making a 'pool', now where to store it... Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_A3Vr8i3xit1_6g-dyTNrkbJWGibC3Z4_qLLYdJPtw6Q>