Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:07:00 -0600 From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net> To: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen), Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf question Message-ID: <4.3.2.20020312135845.0369fc20@207.227.119.2> In-Reply-To: <shk7sha9n2.7sh@localhost.localdomain> References: <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org> <Pine.GSO.4.32.0203121126520.1546-100000@nippur.irb.hr> <20020312074349.A91204@blackhelicopters.org> <20020312155618.GA9463@raggedclown.net> <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:06 AM 3/12/02 -0800, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> writes: > > > Remember, the correct dance for an upgrade these days includes the > following: > > > > make buildworld > > make buildkernel > > make installkernel > > <reboot, single-user> > > make installworld > > mergemaster > > <reboot> > >I replace the second two steps with "make kernel". > >I'd be glad to know any disadvantage of that not shared by the two-step. Besides the fact that your modules are stale (make.conf change required to avoid that) or that you are on your own when doing "unsupported" procedures. The biggest problem is passing on such things to those that don't know better, which is a disadvantage to those that later point out the problem with deviating from accepted procedures. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.20020312135845.0369fc20>