Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 12:43:55 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Nielsen <enkhyl@scient.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811021240570.318-100000@ender.sf.scient.com> In-Reply-To: <199811011929.OAA05742@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I frankly don't care that much which IPv6 implementation is chosen. > My concerns are the following: > > 2) that we don't screw any of the existing developers > > 1) that we make whatever necessary fundamental advances we can in the > network stack before taking on additional deadweight If both IPv6 contenders have commit privs, why can't these things be done in parallel, as long as proper regression testing is done? (if I'm being outright stupid, please whack me over the head with a big stick) -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The Art and Science of Electronic Business <http://www.scient.com>; cnielsen@scient.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811021240570.318-100000>