Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:15:26 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDCan Toolchain Summit Summary Message-ID: <86sk57nmfl.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20100531225732.GF31972@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> (Brooks Davis's message of "Mon, 31 May 2010 17:57:32 -0500") References: <20100531225732.GF31972@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> writes: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm." How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with clang/llvm"? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sk57nmfl.fsf>