Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:37:24 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20131027163724.3c99002f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <CADGWnjVX7hHDkHDPVwrZOJGY%2B3BC5mLEq-AdqY4RGYR75qm=eg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADGWnjVX7hHDkHDPVwrZOJGY%2B3BC5mLEq-AdqY4RGYR75qm=eg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:16:00 +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote: > Hello, > > up until now, I'm used to run FreeBSD on SuperMicro servers > with ZFS-over-GELI. Works like a charm, and I'm comfortable > with it w.r.t. administration and so on. > > Now I'm wondering what's the difference to FreeNAS. The _primary_ difference, in my opinion, is the addition and integration of web-based management tools. If this kind of interface is a requirement for you, using FreeNAS usually is the better solution. It's properly tested and well docu- mented. (Still, it's FreeBSD "under the hoos", so you can relapse to your FreeBSD operations knowledge in worst case scenarios.) It's easy to install and to use, that's why it appeals also to beginners. A personal note: I prefer "bare" FreeBSD. This is primarily because avoiding the web interface gives you the chance to automate tasks more easily. I don't like to do manual work, that's what computers are _made for_. With a normal FreeBSD installation, you can use all your scripting and remoting skills without having the need to pay attention to possible side effects to the additional parts that FreeNAS introduces, for example damages of the web interface. Also some pre- configured defaults or "hardcoded settings" might not fit particular needs, and it's often easier to access and change those with the known CLI tools, instead of investing time to find out the corresponding settings in the web GUI (maybe even with the result of acknowledging that there is no way to tweak that _specific_ setting through the web interface). If low-power devices as "storage applicances" are your goal, probably FreeBSD is easier to strip of any unneccessary over- head than trying to remove things like e. g. the web server and the web admin GUI from FreeNAS, with the imaginable result of making it unusable... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131027163724.3c99002f.freebsd>