Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:48:44 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r272840 - in head: sbin/ipfw sys/conf sys/modules/ipfw sys/netgraph sys/netinet sys/netpfil/ipfw
Message-ID:  <2571261.YJvB1AIsTc@ralph.baldwin.cx>
In-Reply-To: <5A09F093-EC19-4E02-8930-224D8CC08D31@ipfw.ru>
References:  <201410091932.s99JWaSc065624@svn.freebsd.org> <6784482.tcpsbB2Pkh@ralph.baldwin.cx> <5A09F093-EC19-4E02-8930-224D8CC08D31@ipfw.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, October 12, 2014 12:14:51 AM Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2014, at 20:13, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 07:32:36 PM Alexander V. Chernikov wr=
ote:
> >> Author: melifaro
> >> Date: Thu Oct  9 19:32:35 2014
> >> New Revision: 272840
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272840
> >>=20
> >> Log:
> >>  Merge projects/ipfw to HEAD.
> >=20
> > Should it now say 'ipfw3' in dmesg instead of ipfw2?  Also, should =
the
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m not sure all these changes are worth renaming ipfw2 to ip=
fw3 :)

A similar change warranted ipfw -> ipfw2 IIRC. :)  Note that the module=
 is=20
still called 'ipfw' in dependencies.  The '2' in ipfw2 was simply the m=
odule
version number.

> > associated filenames (ipfw2.* and ip_fw2.*) be renamed?  (Perhaps b=
ack
> > to just ipfw.* and ip_fw.* to avoid more rototill in the future?)

Another approach would be to just go back to calling it 'ipfw' and drop=
 the
2 entirely.  It's kind of like how pkgng is now called pkg(8), or the
"new NFS client/server" is now just the "NFS client/server".

--=20
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2571261.YJvB1AIsTc>