Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:11:44 +1100
From:      Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
To:        Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/wxgtk26-docs Makefile
Message-ID:  <20051205121144.GN1239@k7.mavetju>
In-Reply-To: <4393F39F.1060008@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200512050647.jB56lS17097786@repoman.freebsd.org> <4393F39F.1060008@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:00:31AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >edwin       2005-12-05 06:47:28 UTC
> >
> >  FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> >  Modified files:
> >    x11-toolkits/wxgtk26-docs Makefile 
> >  Log:
> >  update port: wxgtk26-docs
> >  
> >          Changed PORTNAME to wxgtk_doc_26 to remove duplicate latest
> >          link values with port wxgtk_doc.
> >  
> >  PR:             ports/89929
> >  Submitted by:   Matthias Sund <m.sund@arcor.de>
> >  
> >  Revision  Changes    Path
> >  1.2       +2 -2      ports/x11-toolkits/wxgtk26-docs/Makefile
> 
> I already added a LATEST_LINK to wxgtk24-docs. I suspect that a 
> LATEST_LINK in wxgtk24-docs is less obtrusive than a PORTNAME change in 
> wxgtk26-docs. And also, changing the PORTNAME of an established port 
> just to get a different LATEST_LINK value seems a bit overkill when you 
> can just set a LATEST_LINK value.

Undid the changes and added the LATETS_LINK.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@mavetju.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051205121144.GN1239>