Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:23:52 -0700
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
Cc:        George.Giles@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bind vulnerability
Message-ID:  <3A961008.5EF9D154@softweyr.com>
References:  <OF079902A6.0A92E85C-ON862569FB.00545D43@MC.VANDERBILT.EDU> <20010222172509.E440@ringworld.oblivion.bg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:22:03AM -0600, George.Giles@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu wrote:
> > The bind vulnerability has been fixed in 4.2-current ?
> 
> There is no such thing as 4.2-current.

4.2 is a place, -CURRENT is a direction.

The latest (several) bind vulnerability(s) existed in 4.2, but have been
fixed in -CURRENT (only for system developers, quite scary and unstable)
and -STABLE (useful for real work).

> The BIND vulnerability has been fixed in 4.2-STABLE, yes.

Technically, -STABLE is a direction also.  But the bind vulnerability(s)
are fixed in -STABLE.  Read the handbook about using cvsup.

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A961008.5EF9D154>