Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:34:58 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Justin Cormack <justin@specialbusservice.com> Cc: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Deltas between FreeBSD and NetBSD and POSIX conformance (was "[Bug 194828] [test] lib.libc.sys.getcontext_test.setcontext_link fails on amd64, not i386") Message-ID: <EFD6FB6C-FAA8-4ED5-A732-F9C6B0B41E97@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAK4o1WwnhBAcHqoLuL78DW=3ffn-WEo8=fSX5CAPZcATzpUOxg@mail.gmail.com> References: <bug-194828-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-194828-32464-gV6nGjZR8b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <CAK4o1WwnhBAcHqoLuL78DW=3ffn-WEo8=fSX5CAPZcATzpUOxg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:28, Justin Cormack <justin@specialbusservice.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:35 AM, <bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org> wrote: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194828 >> >> --- Comment #12 from Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 <ngie@FreeBSD.org> --- >> In a perfect world I would like for everything to be consistent between FreeBSD >> and NetBSD, but that's not the way it should be, and that's a silly ideal to >> hope for :). > > NetBSD dev here... I would rather that tests actually test behaviour > as defined in standards, especially for eg libc tests, and indeed I > have bunch of stuff to add more tests on standards compliance. So if > stuff is testing implementation internals it should go away, and if > NetBSDs behaviour is incorrect please file an issue, or if the test > setup is not eg standards compliant please file an issue > http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/sendpr.cgi?gndb=netbsd Hi Justin! Thanks for the input. I’ve filed a few bugs up on the NetBSD PR tracker (look for "Garrett Cooper” as the originator). Most of the bugs I’ve filed/will file have to deal with header compile issues (FreeBSD is more pedantic about headers and less likely to pollute in the header namespace it seems than NetBSD is). However, I’ve filed a few bugs for other issues too, e.g. http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=48910 , http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=48962 , http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=49001 , http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=49013 . Cheers! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUZj1CAAoJEMZr5QU6S73eCg4H/iowOkvy/EfNpgw/feReF3/k cnUHGJCMXsnejZQ7zxaWwesd6Q1Mfxim7k3X9vlDPkoGJX9rxhSMrOqqb7HufQzr dfa+T6oNM57Ma/qKfmUvM6R0vP/pEZ+Ii8tNS6TlcXfSThLN//bzDlrv/THjDIxo tURxurCHPyvJIJghcm/mwRXgV+19whANXOxpUvHtz9UIcOVF2hyDqgrX8ERif1Zm 2oODJB1MLtW1HwtnOkYdwiw/55YwAyDblzHFSaidFSe7f/GuZOMeuqc+LwvpXAjH h6Ft4huVkIIze108rbCOXADCtFXn+s1Vnlzx5bnciI9oA+xKVPnQr/k5GYs+RWY= =8Ypl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EFD6FB6C-FAA8-4ED5-A732-F9C6B0B41E97>