Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:25:39 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bundled libraries in ports, any policy? Message-ID: <53E0CD43.7010302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADL2u4iMi736QuO-t-1ssrh0Y6MqOg2Ky_OO8vJueHbB=C8hBQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADL2u4iMi736QuO-t-1ssrh0Y6MqOg2Ky_OO8vJueHbB=C8hBQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
René Ladan ha scritto: > Although the above example is specific to Chromium, do we want a policy for > bundled libraries in general? For example, Fedora an Gentoo have a policy > that favors the use system libraries (what we call LIB_DEPENDS) Yes, we prefer always system/port libraries, if there aren't strong reasons to do otherwise (e.g. a highly customized bundled version) -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53E0CD43.7010302>