Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:06:48 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs Message-ID: <20081113070648.GC1098@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200811130447.mAD4lbJG051137@ambrisko.com> References: <20081112210513.GM47073@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <200811130447.mAD4lbJG051137@ambrisko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Nov-12 20:47:37 -0800, Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> wrote: >I plan to commit it tomorrow since I sent it to Tim to test. The 10 can= =20 >be tuned but it has kept a bunch of machines at work up. Glad people=20 >don't think it is that it is to wrong :-) It probably could be made >a little more dynamic but I wonder if it would show any real performance >difference and might risk more bugs. FWIW, I've been running the patch since I first saw Doug post it in Feb 2006 and don't recall ever having problems with mksnap_ffs since applying it (I did before) --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkb0ggACgkQ/opHv/APuIfn9ACgoAPXKgHPozEobZE6i7tpL8vz dRUAn286tcAl1i3Dd9VfSVijhLNketFJ =zPvP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081113070648.GC1098>