Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:04:58 -0500 From: Julio Merino <julio@meroh.net> To: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confusion over BSD.tests.dist Message-ID: <CADyfeQVxJbX7uRWtOhCsBNQdZ7=qnwH=s7QCYWQbq%2BLO4E%2BESg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AD5A2A2F-DC12-4DBC-8E63-9EC7A872B7B7@gmail.com> References: <83E6FED5-2E76-4E43-9547-C0DC1C90DBBD@gmail.com> <AD5A2A2F-DC12-4DBC-8E63-9EC7A872B7B7@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > Forwarding this message to freebsd-testing for others to have context in terms of what I’m proposing be done. > Thanks! > -Garrett > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> >> Subject: Confusion over BSD.tests.dist >> Date: November 24, 2013 at 2:01:25 PM PST >> To: Julio Merino <julio@meroh.net> >> >> Hi Julio, >> I think there’s some confusion over what the intent of this file was. I originally planned for it to be strictly for tests, and it seems to have morphed into a tests and test infrastructure mtree file. This is mostly ok, except for the fact that now if I specify TESTSBASE != /usr/tests, things will fail in the build. >> I’d like to fix this, but that means that the ATF/Kyua infrastructure pieces really need to be moved out into their own mtree file. Does that sound ok? Is TESTSBASE supposed to be customizable? (And before answering that: are things like LIBDIR or INCLUDEDIR user-tunabale?) -- Julio Merino / @jmmv
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADyfeQVxJbX7uRWtOhCsBNQdZ7=qnwH=s7QCYWQbq%2BLO4E%2BESg>