Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:56:31 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Subject: Re: Another compile error Message-ID: <19981102215631.17752@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.981102214619.asmodai@wxs.nl>; from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai on Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 09:46:19PM %2B0100 References: <19981102213827.00944@follo.net> <XFMail.981102214619.asmodai@wxs.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 09:46:19PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > On 02-Nov-98 Eivind Eklund wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 09:40:28AM -0800, John Polstra wrote: > >> I recommend that you CVSup your sources to "/usr/src". That's the > >> standard place for the system sources. > > > > I disagree. I think it would be very good if more people had their > > sources in non-standard location, as it make it more likely that > > somebody introducing a new location dependency get caught. Bruce did > > a lot of work to eliminate all the dependencies on the location. > > Heh, so now I am back at square #1. =) > > If I have a seperate slice, let's say /cvs which I would like to use for > cvsup that all goes well. Now when I do a make world in /cvs/src does it > update the /usr/src as well? Or does this require additional fiddling? That > is what keeps evading my mind... I pull my advice. Run it in /usr/src for the time being. 'make world' updates the binaries; cvsup just updates the sources in the place you specify. So no, 'make world' will not update /usr/src. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981102215631.17752>