Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:46:24 -0553.75 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 64 bit linux binary support Message-ID: <56991306.4000005@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7Th1R3%2B=7TPikQ6vcRy7=_T1CdCAS=9DRX8u7-dufPh7w@mail.gmail.com> References: <5696740B.5070404@hiwaay.net> <CAHieY7ThPcq6NDCuz_M2TuQUJuU1ZMKQrUYBuUnn3Gm5sFnaDg@mail.gmail.com> <86si20mza9.fsf@gmail.com> <CAHieY7SbzFG0zLtj=FD3=_eNsN9Lu3LjmYGP09U1_AXxGf9J2A@mail.gmail.com> <5697B6DE.6000706@hiwaay.net> <CAHieY7Th1R3%2B=7TPikQ6vcRy7=_T1CdCAS=9DRX8u7-dufPh7w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/15/16 05:24, Alejandro Imass wrote: <snip> > AFAIK this is not the case. The reason Docker is lightweight to begin > with is because: > "Containers running on a single machine all share the same operating > system kernel so they start instantly and make more efficient use of > RAM" See: https://wiki.freebsd.org/VIMAGE/Linux/CentOS55 (refers to jails, not docker) <snip> > > IMO virtualization is not lightweight by definition. So you either > virtualize fully or pseudo-virtualize with chroot-like systems. > In this perspective I see Docker as nothing more than a sophisticated > chroot system just like FBSD Jails, only Linux-based and less mature > ;-) > > Best, > Alejandro Imass > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56991306.4000005>