Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:46:34 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: machdep.cpu_idle_hlt and SMP perf?
Message-ID:  <17385.9034.309439.331530@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200602071730.53881.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <17379.56708.421007.613310@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200602071037.05314.jhb@freebsd.org> <17385.7187.845964.182297@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200602071730.53881.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

John Baldwin writes:
 > On Tuesday 07 February 2006 17:15, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > > John Baldwin writes:
 > >  > On Monday 06 February 2006 17:37, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > >  > > John Baldwin writes:
 > >  > >  > On Monday 06 February 2006 14:46, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > >  > >  > > Andre Oppermann writes:
 > >  > >  > >  > Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > >  > >  > >  > > Why dooes machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1 drop my 10GbE network rx
 > >  > >  > >  > > performance by a considerable amount (7.5Gbs -> 5.5Gbs)?
 > >  > >  >
 > >  > >  > You may be seeing problems because it might simply take a while for
 > >  > >  > the CPU to wake up from HLT when an interrupt comes in.  The 4BSD
 > >  > >  > scheduler tries to do IPIs to wakeup any sleeping CPUs when it
 > >  > >  > schedules a new thread, but that would add higher latency for
 > >  > >  > ithreads than just preempting directly to the ithread.  Oh, you
 > >  > >  > have to turn that on, it's off by default
 > >  > >  > (kern.sched.ipiwakeup.enabled=1).
 > >  > >
 > >  > > Hmm..  It seems to be on by default.  Unfortunately, it does not seem
 > >  > > to help.
 > >  >
 > >  > I'm not sure.
 > >
 > > One thing which really helps is disabling preemption.  If I do that,
 > > I get 7.7Gb/sec with machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1.  This is slightly better
 > > than machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=0 and no PREEMPTION.
 > >
 > > BTW, net.isr.direct=1 in all testing.
 > 
 > Do you have very little userland activity in this test?

Essentially none.  netserver just sits in a loop, reading from the
socket and throwing the data away.

Drew




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17385.9034.309439.331530>