Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:27:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> To: Paul Robinson <wigstah@akitanet.co.uk> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, David Pick <D.M.Pick@qmw.ac.uk>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Displacement of Blame[tm] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141625450.12329-100000@snafu.adept.org> In-Reply-To: <00071411574600.46406@foo.akitanet.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Paul Robinson wrote: > What I would propose is this - why don't we have 2 lists - one for > freebsd-security where genuine issues with security in the core FreeBSD > distro are discussed, and another (freebsd-ports-security for example) where > announcments on ports shipped with FreeBSD are announced. I like it. Has this already been proposed and dismissed? If so, why? Sounds good to me. I can subscribe to both lists, and those who don't want ports advisories won't have to see them. -mrh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141625450.12329-100000>