Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 16:59:12 +0100 From: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ), Al Reuben <alex@nac.net> Cc: Niall Smart <njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/6774: bind(3)/libc improvement Message-ID: <E0yf55E-0002Fn-00@oak66.doc.ic.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) "Re: kern/6774: bind(3)/libc improvement" (May 28, 4:33pm)
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 28, 4:33pm, Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote: } Subject: Re: kern/6774: bind(3)/libc improvement > Al Reuben <alex@nac.net> writes: > > > > What I propose is an enviornment variable, "LOCAL_BIND" which > > > > would be used by the bind(3) code. If this does not exist, the > > Err, bind 8 does what you are both talking about: > > Doh. We're talking about bind(3), not bind(8) - which, to add to the > general confusion, is not necessarily bind 8, but can be e.g. bind 4 > :) To be absolutely clear, we are talking about bind(2), and not bind(n), n element of R, n != 2. Niall To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0yf55E-0002Fn-00>