Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:35:26 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, FreeBSD Arch <arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang Message-ID: <20100518073526.GA96818@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4BF1B352.4030306@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl> <4BEEE8A9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20100517064908.GX56080@hoeg.nl> <20100517091354.GE83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20100517092628.GC56080@hoeg.nl> <4BF1B352.4030306@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:21:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 05/17/10 02:26, Ed Schouten wrote: > > * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> lib/clang/..., as it is done for bind ? > > > > So I guess that would lead to the following directory structure? > > > > - lib/clang/libclang.../ > > - lib/clang/libllvm.../ > > Yes. > > > - usr.bin/clang/clang/ > > - usr.bin/clang/tblgen/ > > I don't think we have any hierarchies like this in the tree currently. I > would vote for just usr.bin/clang, usr.bin/tblgen, etc. How many > binaries are we talking about? two now (clang and tblgen) with one more coming soon (llvm-mc/as)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100518073526.GA96818>