Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:22:30 -0400 From: gnn@freebsd.org To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: igb doesn't compile in STABLE? Message-ID: <m2iqv5n9ah.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0807151035w291269abt4ed99989ae45cc8b@mail.gmail.com> References: <m2bq10i1j1.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <2a41acea0807141453s7235d894i31a744a0f673fcc0@mail.gmail.com> <m2iqv7nkoi.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <2a41acea0807151007q29a783c4r2ae63c5a631952ba@mail.gmail.com> <m2hcarnjfv.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <2a41acea0807151035w291269abt4ed99989ae45cc8b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:35:57 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > > OK, will put on my todo list :) > Thanks. A kernel built that way (i.e. with igb and em) does actually work, which is good, but if you're going to split them up we should get this right before 7.1. Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2iqv5n9ah.wl%gnn>