Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:58:25 +0200 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: qjail1 <qjail1@a1poweruser.com> Cc: "ports\@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Is pkg quarterly really needed? Message-ID: <y3ux-bqku-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com> (qjail1@a1poweruser.com's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:54:21 -0400") References: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
qjail1 <qjail1@a1poweruser.com> writes: > I maintain a port and I have users complaining that the pkg system > takes many months before the updated version of my port shows up in > the pkg system. Better ask committer assigned to your bug to add MFH tag or send an email to ports-secteam@ (and CC portmgr@) which commit to backport. For leaf ports such requests are unlikely to be declined, just keep in mind risks due to using old dependencies and possible regressions.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y3ux-bqku-wny>