Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:26:22 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: David Hogan <david@fundamentalit.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? Message-ID: <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Hogan wrote: > In my time with the Trustix lists, I don't think I came across a serious > kernel issue that wasn't caused by either a lack of a preinstalled driver or > a bad stick of ram. Would you say that this holds true for FreeBSD? I If that Trustix works for you now well, you'd be careless to migrate now. If it works, why change it? My experience with the 5.x tree so far is that it's ok for a SOHO or private environment but I wouldn't trust it if my money (or job) depended on it. Maybe in a year, or two but not now. mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42A6C7CE.9000002>