Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:09:27 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: shimon@simon-shapiro.org Cc: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, jak@cetlink.net, opsys@mail.webspan.net, smp@csn.net, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, "John S.Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <199803031609.JAA29162@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.980302222124.shimon@simon-shapiro.org> References: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980303143444.3809A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> <XFMail.980302222124.shimon@simon-shapiro.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > ODI's ObjectStore is faster than Oracle, Sybase, or Informix. Much > > faster. > > Does it support a true relational model? Not really. > Purely OO database engine is > heirarchial in nature and better be faster than a relational. It depends. If you data is organized in such a manner that heirachial (sp?) data access is faster, then it's a win. But, if you end up having lots of 'built-in' relationships that aren't necessarily obvious or setup apriori from the objects themselves, then it can be *much* slower. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803031609.JAA29162>