Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:11:07 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.ORG>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: teTeX port update Message-ID: <20030220231107.GA40255@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20030220221023.GL6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20030219165853.GA34987@fling-wing.demos.su> <20030220184437.GA68967@intruder.bmah.org> <20030220195253.GA31602@intruder.bmah.org> <20030220221023.GL6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:52:53AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > Another note: The sizes of various tables as encoded in
> > ${PREFIX}/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf seem to be somewhat larger than
> > before. This might make the admonitions in
> > ports/print/jadetex/pkg-message obsolete (in fact, some of the tables
> > are now larger than what jadetex asks for). Not sure how this affects
> > building documents. I'm running some tests against the release
> > documentation now...will report more if anything interesting shows up.
>=20
> I'll check this in detail at the weekend, unless someone beats me to it.
>=20
> It'll be interesting to see if this lets teTeX build the PDF version of
> the Handbook again.
Actually, it does!
Here's what I did: =20
1. Fix up two config variables in texmf.cnf:
hash_extra =3D 100000
save_size =3D 15000
2. Get rid of the hack in the Handbook's Makefile to derive the PDF
file from the PS file.
3. Build it.
I use an OpenJade-based toolchain, so I got all of the PDF bookmarks
one would normally expect, and so forth. Quite nice. :-)
I guess we should let the new teTeX port settle a bit before switching
the Handbook to native PDF generation, huh?
Bruce.
PS. Is there any reason we can't just switch over to OpenJade (as
opposed to Jade) by default? OpenJade is already the default for
non-i386 architectures.
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+VWCL2MoxcVugUsMRAjgGAJ9hPF4XHUCHK0xLyljNS5YCQf2tHACg7D9v
25FkMS1I95GtwxdpO0ZSFr0=
=Y4yY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030220231107.GA40255>