Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 19:14:08 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers), freebsd-stable@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Stable Users), FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD current users) Subject: Re: The -stable problem: my view Message-ID: <199606080114.TAA01864@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <17605.834196067@time.cdrom.com> References: <199606072306.RAA01251@rocky.sri.MT.net> <17605.834196067@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I don't use 'cvs update -j' to merge it into -stable. 'merge' doesn't > > Yes, but I'd like to be able to is kinda the point. The kinds of gyrations > you describe as being necessary only underscore my point.. :-) P3 isn't going to make this any easier, so you're going to have to go through gyrations. The complexity of merging two *very* different trees isn't going to change, and no automatic scheme is going to make it any easier.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606080114.TAA01864>