Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:28:21 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: Paul Robinson <wigstah@akitanet.co.uk>, Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, David Pick <D.M.Pick@qmw.ac.uk>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Displacement of Blame[tm] Message-ID: <200007142328.RAA39908@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:27:11 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141625450.12329-100000@snafu.adept.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141625450.12329-100000@snafu.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141625450.12329-100000@snafu.adept.org> Mike Hoskins writes: : On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Paul Robinson wrote: : : > What I would propose is this - why don't we have 2 lists - one for : > freebsd-security where genuine issues with security in the core FreeBSD : > distro are discussed, and another (freebsd-ports-security for example) where : > announcments on ports shipped with FreeBSD are announced. : : I like it. Has this already been proposed and dismissed? If so, : why? Sounds good to me. I can subscribe to both lists, and those who : don't want ports advisories won't have to see them. I don't think it woudl work. Bugtraq would subscribe to both of them and Brett's clients would still be concerned. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007142328.RAA39908>