Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:06:10 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 Message-ID: <8663sof2v1.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <AC78CAC0-BA7C-4A20-9BEE-E7E37FD225E7@netconsonance.com> (Jo Rhett's message of "Wed\, 4 Jun 2008 16\:46\:01 -0700") References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> <4846D849.2090005@FreeBSD.org> <4846E14C.709@FreeBSD.org> <AC78CAC0-BA7C-4A20-9BEE-E7E37FD225E7@netconsonance.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> writes: > It has changed multiple times. I keep reviewing and finding 6.3 bugs > outstanding, and then observe the EoL get pushed. The EoL date for 6.2 was pushed back *once* and once only, and that was not in response to any specific bug report. See for yourself: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/www/en/security/security.sgml DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8663sof2v1.fsf>