Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 19:10:21 -0500 From: Guangyuan Yang <ygy@freebsd.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org> Cc: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Pau Amma <pauamma@gundo.com>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, portmgr@freebsd.org, "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bringing back lang/python27 with few modules? Message-ID: <CABBk%2B3rVumDHDgptJ5WtYF26nD6awTShHEgiy=UKxUhN_bH9sg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAH7qZfvBQ0gKEdOn7nTuzAbMOG9LM2DVGyUs9b9PGwNgJTDCAw@mail.gmail.com> <56cb1da0-311a-d498-f7a0-db2c0d11dca4@FreeBSD.org> <2adfb8979b5477639f4b4a214ef88a90@gundo.com> <YZtnBObluID4XlnG@freefall.freebsd.org> <fa837481-38a1-d6bc-ebc4-90e48eba7f5c@quip.cz> <YZytBkvuIvS9%2BLwN@freefall.freebsd.org> <325e53db-a47b-164b-949b-fbedaf10924b@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org> =E4=BA=8E2021=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8825=E6=97= =A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=886:40=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > On 23/11/2021 7:57 pm, Rene Ladan wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:46:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >> On 22/11/2021 10:46, Rene Ladan wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:57:56AM +0000, Pau Amma wrote: > >>>> On 2021-11-18 01:37, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >>>>> We've had many user reports over the last year re the entire > >>>>> situation, including a number recently about pypy in particular. > >>>> > >>>> Late to the discussion, but I'm sad that Chromium survived the Pytho= n2.7 > >>>> removal and Iridium didn't. :-( > >>> > >>> Upstream Iridium always seems to lag behind Chromium for a bit, but i= t is > >>> doing OK now I geuss (one major version behind). The problem with Iri= dium > >>> is also volunteer time to keep the port up to date, one Chromium-like= port > >>> is already a lot. > >> > >> Even if you are OK with Chromium, there are users for which Chromium i= s > >> not an option and Iridium is more than just preferable. (or Ungoogled, > >> or Brave or something else not so heavily tied to Google spying / trac= king) > >> > >> Removing Iridium was a really bad step. > >> > > To all of those that keep complaining that Iridium got removed: > > feel free to bring it back and maintain it. > > > > Regards, > > Ren=C3=A9 > > > > Not helpful Rene. Thank you. > The nice thing about a version control system is that we can revert and adjust things. So I believe that interested people should not be discouraged to work on the revival of that port, and I see no problem in this particular advice that "we will discuss it after someone steps up to maintain it" as a next step. Best, --=20 Guangyuan Yang ygy@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABBk%2B3rVumDHDgptJ5WtYF26nD6awTShHEgiy=UKxUhN_bH9sg>