Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Dec 1996 00:48:10 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/vi Makefile
Message-ID:  <199612302348.AAA18954@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199612302211.XAA00711@ravenock.cybercity.dk> from "sos@FreeBSD.org" at "Dec 30, 96 11:11:37 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Nothing about committing anymore, moved to -current.)

As sos@FreeBSD.org wrote:

> All in all I just think its rediculous that we have almost doubled
> the size of of src tree but have gained almost no extra functionality..

No extra functionality: maybe.  But nothing gained: no.  Replacing
blatant shell scripts (and sometimes unintelligible ones) by Perl did
at least gain speed.  Do you still remember the old catman(1)?

I've looked at a shell script today that accompanies mgetty+sendfax,
as an add-on (new_fax).  When i first called it, with the provided
sample config file, my process accounting file grew by 300+ lines.

:-O

(After looking into it, it's been a typical Perl candidate, and even
as a shell script, poorly coded.)

I think there are similar arguments for replacing this or that
uglyhack program by a Tcl script, it's just that i'm not this familiar
with Tcl.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612302348.AAA18954>