Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:06:40 -0000
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org>, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>,  src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>,  svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r346039 - head/sys/conf
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfpiju=1pQ4WUPrd-S48U_mTEsc85uE3P8F8y%2BSNtNfyqA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a653d60cdd96d6dbddfada70053b8d1dc9adad60.camel@freebsd.org>
References:  <201904081825.x38IPEpV054311@repo.freebsd.org> <c8880833-5a0e-c05c-1b3c-c6b027fed42c@bluestop.org> <a653d60cdd96d6dbddfada70053b8d1dc9adad60.camel@freebsd.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:40 AM Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 11:19 -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> > On 2019-04-08 12:25, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > Author: imp
> > > Date: Mon Apr  8 18:25:14 2019
> > > New Revision: 346039
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346039
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >    Style only change: Prefer $() to ``
> > >
> > >    $() is more modern and also nests. Convert the mix of styles to
> > > using
> > >    only the former (although the latter was more common). It's the
> > > more
> > >    dominant style in other shell scripts these days as well.
> > >
> > >    Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19840
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > >    head/sys/conf/newvers.sh
> > >
> > > Modified: head/sys/conf/newvers.sh
> >
> >
> > I thought I saw an email a few weeks ago that suggested that the list
> > of
> > people who reviewed the patch should be copied into a "Reviewed by:"
> > line, to avoid only having that information in Phabricator.
> >
> > Am I remembering correctly, or is just mentioning the Phab review
> > considered sufficient?
> >
> >
>
> As far as I'm concerned, if I've gone to all the trouble to have
> something phab-reviewed, I'm not going to waste a bunch of time hand-
> copying metadata from the review to the commit message; citing the
> review is sufficient.
>

There's that too....

Project norms here have a gap between what people expect to happen, and
what actually happens. This is orthogonal to the whole uselessly duplicated
metadata issue causing friction.

Warner


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfpiju=1pQ4WUPrd-S48U_mTEsc85uE3P8F8y%2BSNtNfyqA>