Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:04:40 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: kc5vdj@yahoo.com, Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KSE kernel comparissons Message-ID: <p05101011b7b09bf27e5f@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <3B8AD790.1050608@yahoo.com> References: <69957.998948345@critter> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108271509190.74870-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20010827190504.A8647@technokratis.com> <3B8AD790.1050608@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 6:28 PM -0500 8/27/01, Jim Bryant wrote: >The patches seem relatively benign, and after some basic >immediate testing, they should be committed to -current. >That's all I'm trying to say. Then shut up and help test it. That's what KSE needs, some people who are willing to help out with the work. So far you've been blowing a lot of smoke in these KSE threads, pretending that you support it. Most of that support has been demanding that other people do stuff, instead of any reasoned or intelligent input. Almost everyone else in this thread is at least TRYING to be professional about presenting the options, no matter what their opinion might be. All of them "support" KSE in the sense of wanting to see that work in FreeBSD. They also have a number of other legitimate real-world concerns. If you really supported KSE, then you would do something. Something called 'work', which Julian is very familiar with but which seems foreign to your vocabulary. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05101011b7b09bf27e5f>