Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:40:45 -0500 From: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx> To: Andre Goeree <abgoeree@uwnet.nl> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-supfile (-picobsd -science) Message-ID: <20010424144045.A8575@cec.wustl.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010424203624.A11671@mandark.attica.home>; from abgoeree@uwnet.nl on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:36:24PM %2B0200 References: <20010424203624.A11671@mandark.attica.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:36:24PM +0200, Andre Goeree wrote: > [output from CVSup logfile] > Exchanging collection information > Server message: Unknown collection "ports-picobsd" > Server message: Unknown collection "ports-science" > [snip] > Skipping collection ports-picobsd/cvs > Skipping collection ports-science/cvs > > Are these collections not enabled yet? > Would specifying ports-all instead of the seperate collections make > any difference? > > -Andre. I've never heard of a ports that have anything to do with PicoBSD; PicoBSD itself is part of the main source tree (/usr/src/release/picobsd). As for ports-science, I have a ports/science directoy in the tree... Yes, specifying ports-all will get everything the tree has, without breaking. -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010424144045.A8575>