Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 04:31:08 +0000 From: jomor <jomor@ahpcns.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: can IPFW & NAT co-exist with kame IPSEC? Message-ID: <384C8D8B.4E55CC4A@ahpcns.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I want to add support for kame IPSEC (for net-to-net tunnelling)
capability to my existing firewall/NAT box. The box is running freebsd
3.3-STABLE. I am networking with IP-V4 and don't want to go to V6 at
this time. Does anyone know if this is possible? or do I need a
dedicated box for tunnel end-points? If it's possible, what firewall
rule modifications do I need so tunnel-bound traffic doesn't get NAT'ed?
Both of the LANs involved use "private" IP addressing internally. ANY
help is much appreciated.
TIA ...jgm
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?384C8D8B.4E55CC4A>