Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:25:53 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: josh.carroll@gmail.com, remy.nonnenmacher@activnetworks.com, freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7 Message-ID: <471E9F21.7090902@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <471E343C.2040509@FreeBSD.org> References: <8cb6106e0710230902x4edf2c8eu2d912d5de1f5d4a2@mail.gmail.com> <471E343C.2040509@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > One major difference is that your workload is 100% user. Also you were > reporting ULE had more idle time, which looks like a bug since I would > expect it be basically 0% idle on such a workload. > > Kris > We can not ignore this performance bug, also I had found that ULE is slower than 4BSD when testing super-smack's update benchmark on my dual-core machine. Regards, David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?471E9F21.7090902>