Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:06:40 -0600 From: Steve Kaczkowski <steve@inc.net> To: Adam Rheaume <viper@2ghz.net> Cc: Mark Holloway <mholloway@flashmail.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OC3 versus T1 Circuits Message-ID: <38BC8940.6B24A444@inc.net> References: <200002291838.NAA29138@etinc.com> <38BC7C9B.D6CD19AB@2ghz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Rheaume wrote: > > If they are all going to be pure ansi and only 60 concurrent connections > running at lets say 38400 a full T1 would be fine. With OE and maybe > some web/file stuff to be safe I would say a bonded 2 T1's would be > perfect. Maybe overkill also.. What per K will each user pull that is > the question also will they all use it at the same time. Think like a > ISP, when there are dial in users there is never enough for the whole > cust base to dial in at once it is based on a percentage. > Thing is in the computer and networking world can you EVER have too much? I mean it's not like you or your users are going to complain if it's TOO fast, right? Bottom line is that you have to look at the dollars and see how much you can spend, if you have the money to do it, GO for it! By going the OC3 route you've got LOTS and LOTS of room for expansion because it will happen sooner or later and by doing it right the first time there is less need for forklift upgrades.. Just my $.02 -- Steve Kaczkowski Time Warner Telecom IDD steve@inc.net (414)908-9012 http://www.inc.net (603)737-9209 Fax To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38BC8940.6B24A444>