Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Mar 2001 12:28:51 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Farooq Mela <fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: pthread_exit proto
Message-ID:  <20010304122851.R8663@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <3AA2A268.111D5261@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us>; from fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:15:36PM -0800
References:  <3AA29546.7D709D6@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> <20010304115811.Q8663@fw.wintelcom.net> <3AA2A268.111D5261@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Farooq Mela <fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> [010304 12:14] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> 
> > Is '__dead2' a GNU C thing?  or is in any sort of standard?
> 
> See /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h
> 
> __dead2 is defined to __attribute__((__noreturn__)) if a suitable
> version of GCC is being used.
>  
> > Generally there's some resistance to putting GNU C specific
> > code into the base system, is there a portable way to do this?
> 
> It's not actually gcc-specific code, its more of a hint to the compiler
> to not warn about something like, main() "falling off the end" when
> there is actually an exit(0); at the end of it. If GCC knows exit()
> never returns to its caller it doesnt warn.

I understood what it did, I just needed some reference to make sure
it was being used in other places as an acceptable option.

Thanks, this is what I was expecting you to provide, I'll commit
the fix rsn.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010304122851.R8663>