Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:42:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210479] blacklistd(8) and sshd(8) causes login delays and syslog(8) spam Message-ID: <bug-210479-8-rCYGi6Uj5R@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210479-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210479-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210479 --- Comment #4 from Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Glen Barber from comment #3) > (In reply to lidl from comment #2) > > The debug logging is expected. > > > > I think this makes auditdistd(8) unhappy. > > > I'm unclear by your comment about delays - delays due to the error state, or > > delay due to the extra syslog statements. > > > > In timing of a simple 'ssh hostname df \> /dev/null', I get the same > > wall-clock time, regardless of blacklistd running on the remote host. > > (I do see the debug messages in the debug.log on the remote host.) > > > > Can you quantify the delays you're seeing? > > Between head and stable/10, I see an increase in responsiveness. Sigh. I meant 'decrease', not 'increase'. Shame on me for editing the reply without double-checking the sentence... > gjb@nucleus:~ % time ssh ref10-amd64.freebsd.org exit > 0.010u 0.010s 0:01.14 1.7% 192+148k 4+0io 0pf+0w > > gjb@nucleus:~ % time ssh ref11-amd64.freebsd.org exit > 0.020u 0.000s 0:01.55 1.2% 96+74k 4+1io 0pf+0w > > The only "known" difference is the addition of blacklistd(8). > > In either case, I think the debug.log spam is a bit overkill, especially for > machines without large /var directories (embedded systems, etc.). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210479-8-rCYGi6Uj5R>