Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:36:36 -0700
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds
Message-ID:  <20110706193636.GA69550@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CACqU3MVLr5VXRovs1uV%2BzHazJi2rrjE9Sp3XzsCPJ0Un06pmDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4E1421D9.7080808@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CALH631=F4bSgNDE4w0qcXGMgGxZRRwCP9n-H4M0c%2B1UEaqWr7Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E147F54.40908@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CACqU3MVLr5VXRovs1uV%2BzHazJi2rrjE9Sp3XzsCPJ0Un06pmDQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
> <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>
> >> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
> >> better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
> >> back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
> >>
> >
> > If you are using MPI in numerical codes, then you want
> > to use SCHED_4BSD. ?I've posted numerous times about ULE
> > and its very poor performance when using MPI.
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-October/026375.html
> >
> [sarcasm]
> It is rather funny to see that the post you point out has generated
> exactly 0 meaningful follow-up then and as you mention later in this
> thread, the issue still remains today :-)
> [/sarcasm]
> 

Apparently, you are privy to my private email exchanges
with jeffr.

I'm also not sure why you're being sarcastic here.  The
issue was and AFAIK still is a problem for anyone using
FreeBSD in a HPC cluster.  ULE simply performs worse than
4BSD.

-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110706193636.GA69550>