Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 03:15:48 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disabling inetd? Message-ID: <20000626031547.J14265@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000626115146.S36017@zoe.bastard.co.uk>; from adrian@freebsd.org on Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 11:51:46AM %2B0200 References: <20000626053525.U85886@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000626115146.S36017@zoe.bastard.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 11:51:46AM +0200, Adrian Chadd wrote: > If I remember right, the telnet port isn't insecure by itself, only > open telnet connections. So there really isn't anything to be said > for killing telnet for 'out of the box security' - if people use > telnet rather than ssh, they're going to enable it anyway. I cannot quite parse what you are saying. What does speaking about a port's security mean? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000626031547.J14265>