Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:58:24 +0300 From: "Nikolay Kalev" <nkalev@gmail.com> To: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sun4v Tinderbox ! Message-ID: <136a340a0706120658p74ddedaeo4b775ebcdb480fbf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <466CF264.3040409@freebsd.org> References: <136a340a0706102032m56573d08h83fccb0656d373f2@mail.gmail.com> <b1fa29170706102037r19fb8ecaqc4b2fed96da31392@mail.gmail.com> <466CF264.3040409@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maybe, I can't suggest anything good ;-) On 6/11/07, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> wrote: > Kip Macy wrote: > > I'm going to give Xu a couple more days to fix the fallout from his > > pcpu changes. > > > > -Kip > > > > On 6/10/07, Nikolay Kalev <nkalev@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Can someone please fix the sun4v tree so others can test their code on > >> recent ? > >> > >> > > Yes, I know, but adding a pad field to pcpu is not a complete solution, > this can be broken again in future by someone who does not notice this. > > should we put a constraint on pcpu structure, for example: put a > __align(64) there ? > > Regards, > David Xu > > > -- Key fingerprint = 1932 68D3 AC9D D5BE 8717 AA5E C272 B46C 42BC 6DC2
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?136a340a0706120658p74ddedaeo4b775ebcdb480fbf>