Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:50:31 +0100 From: Dean Strik <dean@stack.nl> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Users of netatm/HARP Message-ID: <20050311205031.GA24646@dragon.stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050310125438.P35964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20050310125438.P35964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Harti Brandt wrote: > the netatm directory containing the HARP code is basically unmaintained. > Giving that most of the usual ATM stuff can now also be done with NgATM it > is intented to remove netatm at one point in HEAD. The one missing piece > in NgATM that netatm does is CLIP over signalled connections. I have some > code for this that worked with earlier versions of NgATM, but I doubt that > I have enough time in the next view months to actual bring this into > current. > > So the question is: what would break for whom if we remove netatm? ForeIP and SPANS? :) But I don't think supporting these is worth the trouble and IMHO harp can be retired now... -- Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology dean@stack.nl | dean@ipnet6.org | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050311205031.GA24646>