Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:37:41 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: python ports broken (sem_destroy: Resource temporarily unavailable)
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402051836340.16338-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402051520420.16695-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:06:22AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > I rebuilt world yesterday after Daniel said some relevant changes had
> > > been made.  A fresh package build is now causing lots (all?) python
> > > ports to fail.  e.g.:
> > > 
> > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/py23-anonfunc-1.0.log
> > > 
> > > Any ideas?
> > > 
> > > Kris
> > 
> > Actually lots of the package builds seem to be hanging in this way.
> 
> I'm looking at this but don't see anything wrong yet.  I've
> just started a buildworld and will see if I can get sem_destroy()
> to fail.
> 
> FYI, sem_destroy() returns -1 with errno = EBUSY when there
> are waiters waiting on the semaphore.

I think I fixed the problem (see last commit to libc/gen/sem.c).
Please continue to let me know of any problems you find.

-- 
Dan Eischen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10402051836340.16338-100000>