Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:21:27 -0800 From: Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Oleg Ogurok <oleg@ogurok.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: which branch? Message-ID: <20000316122126.A90676@mushhaven.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003161156230.63685-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003161449360.83199-100000@ogurok.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003161156230.63685-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 11:58:32AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Oleg Ogurok wrote: > > > > > Does 4.0-STABLE exists? > > Yes. Of course since the 4.x branch has only just been born, there are > likely to be some problems worked out over the course of the next few > weeks, so please don't just slap this on a production server without > testing first, etc :) Your testing will however be very valuable and help > to improve the quality of the branch. I've been wondering about this, as I have seen it go by a few times along with almost-flames of all the people sure to go slap this on a server... -STABLE is supposed to be safe to put on a server. If 4.x is .not. yet safe... Why is it in -STABLE? This kinda bugs me as it fairly well defeats the point of having a -STABLE if it isn't, in fact, stable. Jamie > Kris > > ---- > In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000316122126.A90676>