Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 00:06:02 +0100 From: Moin Rahman <bofh@freebsd.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Proposal to remove PECL ports from the PEAR category Message-ID: <1B032656-64BF-44E1-9A43-5192806A7E82@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <47b6ed22-0013-4210-bb23-b3e54814c8dc@quip.cz> References: <47b6ed22-0013-4210-bb23-b3e54814c8dc@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_2C482CE7-EA37-4FB6-9842-3EEE64A960D1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Mar 2, 2024, at 11:59 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> = wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I did a little survey on PHP PECL ports and found that almost half of = the PECL ports (27 out of 68) have PEAR listed as the second category. I = believe this is a mistake and PECL ports should not be listed in the = PEAR category because PECL [1] ports are PHP extensions (wrappers for C = libraries), but PEAR [2] ports are libraries written in PHP. >=20 > Or did I miss something and there is a reasonable reason for PECL = ports to be also listed in the PEAR category? >=20 > These are 27 ports: >=20 > archivers/pecl-lzf archivers pear > archivers/pecl-rar archivers pear > databases/pecl-mongodb databases pear > databases/pecl-rrd databases pear > devel/pecl-dio devel pear > devel/pecl-excimer devel pear > devel/pecl-expect devel pear > devel/pecl-uploadprogress devel pear > devel/pecl-uuid devel pear > devel/pecl-vld devel pear > devel/pecl-xdebug devel pear > graphics/pecl-qrencode graphics pear > net-im/pecl-stomp2 net-im pear > net/pecl-amqp net pear > net/pecl-oauth2 net pear > net/pecl-radius net security pear > net/pecl-rdkafka net pear > net/pecl-smbclient net pear > net/pecl-xmlrpc net pear > security/pecl-krb5 security pear > security/pecl-mcrypt security pear > security/pecl-pam security pear > security/pecl-scrypt security pear > security/pecl-ssh2 security pear > sysutils/pecl-proctitle sysutils pear > textproc/pecl-xdiff2 textproc pear > textproc/pecl-yaml textproc pear >=20 > Should I submit a PR with a patch for all 27 ports? >=20 > [1] https://pecl.php.net/ > [2] https://pear.php.net/ >=20 > Kind regards > Miroslav Lachman >=20 As the maintainer of php I do agree with this. The only problem is other maintainers of some of the ports do not. There was a discussion on this long time(php5) ago which did not see any fruitful result. You can create a review instead in phabricator and add the maintainers and retry again. Kind regards, Moin --Apple-Mail=_2C482CE7-EA37-4FB6-9842-3EEE64A960D1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEETfdREoUGjQZKBS+fvbm1phfAvJEFAmXjsNpfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDRE Rjc1MTEyODUwNjhEMDY0QTA1MkY5RkJEQjlCNUE2MTdDMEJDOTEACgkQvbm1phfA vJH15w//eryFkaIgbFO37trUK1L+MKyGTzF6z1teci8RAKM6R8z18Zan/1OGEQ15 hXGrSm8lND+YOQyusJSpJZB1NDDykKPO9SfD3pgnOTgUzh387f68/eRrXaMyB/FG XgKnFU9riFKXGEpGDT/yqWTrJ+JWQG183S0rn2TukUMg1RevnKEETkrGpAw0dsuO IeSjXRkVmK5FspdyxBsF8ldJ4D+EUOZttg2f8VxzffJGZH7zhUsqH+3jx12jGbt5 DyKYk3FHI/N5vZTwhbjL25I0iRVq30qzEQbzx1JXDQwSCmeZlUzA9dDjG4ca9eeg ixj1B7v2uZu6J+RHs7xlym0ngQg9EvPBpneV9whlYFxrr+YNopc/BwpuJteC5Z0n CeJdqnaUo1pOOYUk9zEVD/Lncewz/SwUoIXod1+O/HyXOoLp4yI/ozhy/QYtb2gV 4CwH0WZZrGb1wifwXbNsY87a5HcP/w6Amgm3xP8g379hxDV362J1oCXzOlRtfXmN wNWusqP9XDIvr9xtvoSpluZ/fFIwg3E+bvAMIoRi4sGa62Zx1ozzIUMsWGGsr+F1 0RbS884rcXGBVcGxkCYFM0vqoXw7ZFrgRXrAHKTArtudYhxuT2u89urvTM7nRQuH RfX6txwkhpVSygZddhovTb846fe6fG8lZ66y09xdayInHodtzHU= =4rlY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_2C482CE7-EA37-4FB6-9842-3EEE64A960D1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1B032656-64BF-44E1-9A43-5192806A7E82>