Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:56:40 +0200 From: Matteo Riondato <rionda@gufi.org> To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/80290: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 Message-ID: <20050425175640.GB846@kaiser.sig11.org> In-Reply-To: <200504240700.j3O70dtX005273@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200504240700.j3O70dtX005273@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 07:00:39AM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > The following reply was made to PR docs/80290; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl> > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: docs/80290: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 > Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:09:07 +0000 > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:57:27AM +0000, Jesus R. Camou wrote: > > Synopsis: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: jcamou > > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 24 02:55:58 GMT 2005 > > State-Changed-Why: > > This is not a typo, nonfs is the intended word. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80290 > > Hello, > > I was thinking about this mistake, and it seems I've posted > wrong patch. I mean I know "nonfs" is correct, but we should > have also "nonullfs", since neither NFS nor NULLFS has to be > mounted. Yes, this is correct. The PR should be reopened with a correct synopsis or you should open a new PR. Thank you. Best Regards -- Rionda aka Matteo Riondato Disinformato per default G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbS9Y2Mp4pR7Fa+wRAiNwAKDIRomvtX1DGmM61oJtkRYa6YablACfVXvC oQSKkXfeD7GVx5qIWohlcD8= =he+J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050425175640.GB846>